1. An Information Infrastructure Gap
India’s media economy is growing rapidly. The sector reached Rs.2.78 lakh crore in 2025, growing 9% in a single year (FICCI-EY, 2026), with digital media crossing Rs.1 lakh crore for the first time to become the industry’s largest segment. Digital advertising now commands two-thirds of all ad spending, having grown 26% year-on-year. But the nature of this growth deserves scrutiny. Indians spent 1.2 trillion hours on their phones in 2025, and nearly 60% of that time went towards entertainment.
The country has 481 million Instagram users, but only 22 million on X (formerly Twitter), the platform most closely associated with news and public discourse. That is a ratio of roughly 22 to 1. India is building a digital economy at extraordinary speed, but the in-formation infrastructure underpinning it is not keeping pace. A country whose citizens cannot reliably distinguish verified reporting from algorithmically surfaced misinformation faces governance challenges that extend well beyond media policy, from public health communication to electoral integrity to the effective implementation of government programmes.
| Country | Instagram (mn) | TikTok (mn) | X (Twitter) (mn) | Video:Text ratio |
| India | 481 | Banned | 22 | 22 : 1 |
| Brazil | 147 | 92 | 17 | 14 : 1 |
| Indonesia | 108 | 108 | 23 | 9 : 1 |
| USA | 182 | 136 | 99 | 3.2 : 1 |
| UK | 35 | 25 | 19 | 3.15 : 1 |
| Germany | 31 | 23 | 19 | 2.8 : 1 |
| Japan | 63 | 27 | 71 | 1.3 : 1 |
2. Why Information Struggles to Travel
The weakness of India’s information ecosystem is not a single failure but a set of reinforcing structural gaps.
Language comes first. India had approximately 129 million English speakers as per Census 2011, a figure widely estimated to have grown since, but the fluency required to participate meaningfully on a text-heavy platform like X is limited to a much smaller subset. Instagram and WhatsApp work effort-lessly in Hindi, Tamil, Marathi, and dozens of other languages. X remains overwhelmingly English, locking it into an urban, educated, upper-income niche.
The algorithms reward speed, not truth. Platform algorithms maximise engagement, not accuracy. A 30-second reel carrying a sensational and untrue message reaches two million views within the span of blinks. A sourced 15-minute ex-plainer on the same topic might reach a few thousand and that too at the peak of its circulation. Misinformation travels rapidly through encrypted WhatsApp groups and blind re-posts. Fact-checks, produced by a handful of under-resourced organisations, rarely receive the same amplification as the original claims.
The institutions that should anchor information culture barely exist. India has roughly 46,000 public libraries for 1.4 billion people. There is no well-funded, editorially independent public digital media entity comparable to the BBC or NHK. Prasar Bharati remains underfunded and editorially constrained. The National Education Policy 2020 references critical thinking but never operationalises media literacy as a curricular component. Most Indians have never been taught how to evaluate whether what they read online is verified reporting or a recycled infographic.
Even the hardware works against depth. India has around 1 billion internet users, the vast majority on smartphones. Reading long threads on a 5.5-inch screen is a friction-heavy experience; swiping through short video is frictionless and provides instant gratification. The dominant device favours passive consumption over active, literate engagement.
3. And Yet, Print Refuses to Die
Against this backdrop, India’s print media tells a counter-intuitive story. The country has over 146,000 registered news-papers and periodicals (Press Registrar General of India, 2023), making it the world’s largest newspaper market by circulation. The print industry was valued at over Rs. 26,000 crore in 2023 and is projected to reach Rs. 28,800 crore by 2026 at a steady CAGR of approximately 3.4% (EY, 2024). Hindi newspapers lead, followed by Marathi and English, with regional publishers like Dainik Bhaskar, Malayala Manorama, and Eenadu retaining deep penetration in Tier-2 and Tier-3 towns, where a newspaper subscription still carries social prestige that transcends information.
The pressures, however, are real. Print’s share of total advertising has fallen from over 30% before 2019 to an estimated 13% by 2026 (dentsu). Distributors are leaving for e- commerce and quick-commerce delivery jobs that pay better. The readership base of newspapers is ageing through the decades and print’s survival in its current form is not guaranteed as the younger generation is drifting away from the printed media. What is clear is that the function print serves, editorial gatekeeping, source verification, institutional accountability, has no ready digital substitute at scale in India today.
4. Where India Stands Against Peer Nations
India’s entertainment-first digital culture is not an Indian peculiarity. It is a global condition. China’s Douyin (TikTok’s Chinese version) crossed 1 billion monthly active users in March 2025 (QuestMobile), reaching roughly 71% of the country’s population. Chinese researchers describe users as being caught in an “entertainment spiral,” with studies on adolescents finding that one of the largest group of Douyin users is aged 6 to 17. Chinese users commonly say that “five minutes on TikTok feels like an hour.” In the United States, a Los Ange-les jury in 2026 found Meta and YouTube liable for negligently designing addictive platforms, with the jury additionally finding “malice, oppression, and fraud” warranting punitive damages. The entertainment-first algorithm is not a developing-country problem. It is a platform-design problem, and every country on earth is grappling with it.
What differs is how countries respond, and India is falling behind on every dimension of that response. China requires Douyin to enforce a “youth mode” that limits users under 14 to 40 minutes per day and blocks access entirely between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. In 2021, the government restricted minors to just three hours of video gaming per week, limited to weekend and holiday evenings only. Australia, in December 2025, became the first democracy to ban social media outright for children under 16, with fines of up to A$50 million for non-compliant platforms (TechCrunch, 2026). Denmark, Spain, Greece, France, Norway, and Portugal have since advanced similar measures at various stages of proposal and enactment, with Malaysia and Austria also preparing their own frameworks. India’s Karnataka became the first Indian state to announce a social media ban for under-16s in March 2026, with Andhra Pradesh following hours later with restrictions for under-13s, but at the national level, India has no equivalent framework, no age-gating mandate, no algorithmic transparency requirement, and no enforceable screen-time regulation. The proposed Digital India Act, announced by MEITY in March 2023 to replace the two-decade-old IT Act, is yet to be tabled in Parliament.
Finland has embedded media literacy across various subjects from early childhood onward, and its public broadcaster YLE runs a “News Class” for adolescents that teaches them how journalism works from the inside. KAVI (the Finnish Media Education Authority), a subordinate of the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture, has a legal task to promote media education, children’s media skills and the development of a safe media environment for children. Finland has topped the Open Society Institute’s Media Literacy Index every year since 2017 for resilience against disinformation. India’s NEP 2020 references critical thinking in passing. Six years on, not a single operational media literacy module has been produced by NCERT.
South Korea, facing its own crisis of declining readership, launched the nationwide “Reading Korea” campaign in April 2026. Among its innovations: “sentence vending machines” installed in Seoul’s COEX Starfield Library that print a book passage matched to whatever emotion you select, book exchange stations where citizens swap a meaningful title for one donated by a stranger, and a public reading pledge backed by cultural figures from actors to classical musicians. South Korea’s Library Act established a Presidential Committee on Library and Information Policy in 2007, which has since produced four successive Comprehensive Library Development Plans. India’s Raja Rammohun Roy Library Foundation, under the Ministry of Culture, operates with a fraction of that institutional backing and has no equivalent mandate for successive national plans.
Japan’s newspaper resilience, arguably the only country that rivals India’s, rests on something deceptively simple: a home delivery infrastructure so deeply embedded in daily life that the Yomiuri Shimbun still circulates 6.2 million copies every morning. Every newspaper in the world’s top ten by daily circulation is either Indian or Japanese (Press Gazette, 2025). The Wall Street Journal, America’s best-selling daily, prints 473,000. India and Japan share the raw material of print culture. What Japan has and India lacks is the institutional scaffolding around it: a public broadcaster (NHK) funded at roughly $33 per citizen through viewer fees (NHK FY2024 financials), a dense library network, and universal literacy that makes reading the default mode of information consumption. India’s Prasar Bharati has received between Rs.2,300 and Rs.2,650 crore annually in recent Union Budgets, depending on the budget head counted (Union Budget documents, 2023-24 to 2025-26). Divided across 1.44 billion people, that amounts to roughly Rs.16-18 per person, or less than $0.25. Germany spends $142 per citizen on public media. The gap is not incremental. It is a competitive disadvantage in an information age where the quality of public discourse directly affects governance outcomes.
India, however, is not without its own innovations. Pratham Books’ StoryWeaver, launched in 2015, has grown into a repository of over 53,000 openly licensed children’s storybooks in 330 languages, recognised as India’s first Digital Public Good for foundational literacy. Pratham’s “Missed Call Do, Kahaani Suno” (give a missed call, listen to a story), first launched in 2017 and scaled up during the pandemic, offers phone-based storytelling for children without internet access. Their partner-ship with CBSE on the Reading Mission now reaches 25,000 schools. In the streets of several Indian cities, the Little Free Library movement has taken root, with volunteer-run book boxes appearing on walls and lampposts. These are encouraging signs, but they remain islands of initiative in an ocean of institutional neglect.
The pattern across peer nations is clear. The countries most resilient to misinformation and most successful at sustaining reading cultures are not necessarily the richest. They are the ones that treat information as a public good: investing in public media, embedding literacy into schools as a civic skill rather than an exam subject, and building physical infrastructure, libraries, reading spaces, community hubs, where the habit of reading can form. India has the raw material. It circulates more newspapers daily than most countries have citizens. What it lacks is the architecture to convert that inheritance into a durable, broad-based information culture.
5. Recommended Interventions
The most immediate lever is education. Media literacy, the ability to distinguish a verified report from a forwarded infographic, is not taught anywhere in the Indian school system. NCERT, under the Ministry of Education, should develop and integrate a media literacy module into the National Curriculum Framework, operationalising the critical thinking objectives already articulated in NEP 2020. Sustained silent reading programmes and classroom libraries should be standard from the secondary level onward. Newspaper-in-Education partnerships, where major publishers place free dailies in schools, have worked in other countries and could be piloted through state-level education departments.
The second lever is institutional investment in the supply of quality information. India needs a well-funded, editorially autonomous public digital media entity producing vernacular content across text, video, and audio. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is the natural custodian of this initiative, with Prasar Bharati’s mandate as a possible starting point for restructuring. The Ministry of Culture, through the RRRLF, should lead a phased national library expansion programme. A vernacular publishing revolution requires the GST Council to revisit the 12% rate on books and the Ministry of Education to commission a national translation mission for nonfiction. Institutional advertising budgets from bodies like DAVP (Directorate of Advertising and Visual Publicity), SEBI, and the Election Commission should be consciously directed towards quality long-form creators rather than disappearing into programmatic ad networks.
The third lever is platform accountability. MEITY, whether through the proposed Digital India Act or amendments to the existing IT Rules, should mandate algorithmic transparency and require platforms to give corrective content at least equal distribution weight to flagged misinformation. A national framework for children’s social media use, building on the state-level initiatives of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, should be developed at the central level. Print, meanwhile, needs modern measurement tools, QR-linked campaigns, AR-enabled ads, NFC integrations, so it can offer advertisers the accountability they currently find only in digital, and slow the migration of ad revenue that is hollowing out the economics of verified journalism.




